<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Equal Parenting Alliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org</link>
	<description>Putting equal parenting on the agenda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:20:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Using harassment law to enforce contact &#8211; update by kipling777</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2010/01/using-harassment-law-to-enforce-contact-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>kipling777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 23:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=311#comment-78</guid>
		<description>Ray,
Your efforts in pushing for a prosecution for something that contravened your Human Rights[The Right to Family Life] has made it a bit easier for all those Dads who will come after us. Thank you.

I&#039;m putting a draft affidavid together. I will state in it that I feel &#039;harassed&#039; and that I believe my Human Rights have been infringed in addition to details of the incidents and a bit of &#039;beefing up&#039;.  Should I mention your Judicial Review in the Statement or at Court or at all?

I want to make it as difficult as possible for a Magistrate to knock me back, for my sake and the sake of other Dads  who will follow.

Apart from that, what am I missing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray,<br />
Your efforts in pushing for a prosecution for something that contravened your Human Rights[The Right to Family Life] has made it a bit easier for all those Dads who will come after us. Thank you.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m putting a draft affidavid together. I will state in it that I feel &#8216;harassed&#8217; and that I believe my Human Rights have been infringed in addition to details of the incidents and a bit of &#8216;beefing up&#8217;.  Should I mention your Judicial Review in the Statement or at Court or at all?</p>
<p>I want to make it as difficult as possible for a Magistrate to knock me back, for my sake and the sake of other Dads  who will follow.</p>
<p>Apart from that, what am I missing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using harassment law to enforce contact &#8211; update by ray</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2010/01/using-harassment-law-to-enforce-contact-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=311#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I missed the other point. Yes I think most most Magistrates will be looking for a reason not to convict. Two of the 3 Magistrates that my case came before used the phrase &quot;opening the floodgates&quot; as a reason to refuse the summons. The Judicial Review judges were on my side on that point: that is not a valid reason in law to refuse me.

However, it does show where the instincts of magistrates may lie. They will be worried their courts will be inundated with similar cases if one of successful. I should add that the 3rd magistrate was very fair and would, I believe, have been well disposed to my prosecution if my evidence had been stronger. So not all magistrates will see it the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I missed the other point. Yes I think most most Magistrates will be looking for a reason not to convict. Two of the 3 Magistrates that my case came before used the phrase &#8220;opening the floodgates&#8221; as a reason to refuse the summons. The Judicial Review judges were on my side on that point: that is not a valid reason in law to refuse me.</p>
<p>However, it does show where the instincts of magistrates may lie. They will be worried their courts will be inundated with similar cases if one of successful. I should add that the 3rd magistrate was very fair and would, I believe, have been well disposed to my prosecution if my evidence had been stronger. So not all magistrates will see it the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using harassment law to enforce contact &#8211; update by ray</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2010/01/using-harassment-law-to-enforce-contact-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=311#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Good point. Proving that someone knew something could be very hard to do. However,there is an alternative which a prosecutor could rely on. You are required to prove that she knew it would harass you or &quot;a reasonable person in possession of the same information would know&quot; it would harass you.

As a prosecutor, therefore, you could rely simply on it being a no-brainer, as you put it. You give evidence, via your own affidavit, that it did cause you distress, and you invite the court to find that any reasonable person in the accused&#039;s position would know that what she did would cause you that distress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. Proving that someone knew something could be very hard to do. However,there is an alternative which a prosecutor could rely on. You are required to prove that she knew it would harass you or &#8220;a reasonable person in possession of the same information would know&#8221; it would harass you.</p>
<p>As a prosecutor, therefore, you could rely simply on it being a no-brainer, as you put it. You give evidence, via your own affidavit, that it did cause you distress, and you invite the court to find that any reasonable person in the accused&#8217;s position would know that what she did would cause you that distress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using harassment law to enforce contact &#8211; update by kipling777</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2010/01/using-harassment-law-to-enforce-contact-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>kipling777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 00:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=311#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Ray, I&#039;ll avoid a big essay, so to be brief, two points to prove:

1/ that the other parent did these acts which you allege
I think this is straight forward and self explanatory. Okay.

2/ that he/she did them knowing that they would cause you distress. 
How can one &#039;PROVE&#039; they KNEW it would cause you distress?

If someone is repeatedly denying me contact with my kids, it should be a no-brainer. I assume repeated requests/faxes to their solicitor /application for a contact order/ for contact should suffice? This is important. If I press for a private prosecution, it is important for ALL Dads that we get as far as possible.

Apart from the above and Time constraints/Quantity of incidents, is there something else we are missing? Was the Magistrate just looking for any excuse to knock you back again?

Thanks,
Kipling777
B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ray, I&#8217;ll avoid a big essay, so to be brief, two points to prove:</p>
<p>1/ that the other parent did these acts which you allege<br />
I think this is straight forward and self explanatory. Okay.</p>
<p>2/ that he/she did them knowing that they would cause you distress.<br />
How can one &#8216;PROVE&#8217; they KNEW it would cause you distress?</p>
<p>If someone is repeatedly denying me contact with my kids, it should be a no-brainer. I assume repeated requests/faxes to their solicitor /application for a contact order/ for contact should suffice? This is important. If I press for a private prosecution, it is important for ALL Dads that we get as far as possible.</p>
<p>Apart from the above and Time constraints/Quantity of incidents, is there something else we are missing? Was the Magistrate just looking for any excuse to knock you back again?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Kipling777<br />
B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Abused Father Syndrome by kipling777</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2009/04/abused-father-syndrome.html/comment-page-1#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>kipling777</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=197#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Yes.

I liken the provocation to someone poking you gently in the arm with a finger. Nothing serious but eventually, if it doesn&#039;t stop....I feel so sorry for those Dads that are pushed over the edge. The Mum then says, there I told you he was unstable, that&#039;s why he committed murder/suicide. Self-fulfilling prophesy

I&#039;m only still here because of friends and support from wherever I could get it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
<p>I liken the provocation to someone poking you gently in the arm with a finger. Nothing serious but eventually, if it doesn&#8217;t stop&#8230;.I feel so sorry for those Dads that are pushed over the edge. The Mum then says, there I told you he was unstable, that&#8217;s why he committed murder/suicide. Self-fulfilling prophesy</p>
<p>I&#8217;m only still here because of friends and support from wherever I could get it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Government Programme for Family Law Reform by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2010/05/government-programme-for-family-law-reform.html/comment-page-1#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=436#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I am sure you will excuse me if I don&#039;t wet myself with excitement with this announcement!

Whilst any review is welcome of course, this doesn&#039;t inspire much confidence in me that any sort of root-and-branch changes will be made. More like a gentle bit of gardening will be underway simply to make it appear tidier.

&quot;... look at how best to provide greater access rights to non-resident parents and grandparents&quot;

Let&#039;s hope my pessimism is mis-placed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure you will excuse me if I don&#8217;t wet myself with excitement with this announcement!</p>
<p>Whilst any review is welcome of course, this doesn&#8217;t inspire much confidence in me that any sort of root-and-branch changes will be made. More like a gentle bit of gardening will be underway simply to make it appear tidier.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; look at how best to provide greater access rights to non-resident parents and grandparents&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope my pessimism is mis-placed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFCASS encourage shared parenting by Families Need Fathers &#8216;Shared Parenting&#8217; Guidelines Controversy &#8211; The Research Evidence &#124; Living Frugal</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2009/07/cafcass-encourage-shared-parenting.html/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Families Need Fathers &#8216;Shared Parenting&#8217; Guidelines Controversy &#8211; The Research Evidence &#124; Living Frugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=286#comment-56</guid>
		<description>[...] Equal Parenting Alliance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CAFCASS encourage shared parenting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Equal Parenting Alliance &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; CAFCASS encourage shared parenting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFCASS encourage shared parenting by Families Need Fathers &#8216;Shared Parenting&#8217; Guidelines Controversy &#8211; The Research Evidence &#124; Living Frugal</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2009/07/cafcass-encourage-shared-parenting.html/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Families Need Fathers &#8216;Shared Parenting&#8217; Guidelines Controversy &#8211; The Research Evidence &#124; Living Frugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 14:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=286#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] Equal Parenting Alliance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CAFCASS encourage shared parenting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Equal Parenting Alliance &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; CAFCASS encourage shared parenting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CAFCASS encourage shared parenting by Families Need Fathers &#8216;Shared Parenting&#8217; Guidelines Controversy &#8211; The Law &#124; Living Frugal</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2009/07/cafcass-encourage-shared-parenting.html/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Families Need Fathers &#8216;Shared Parenting&#8217; Guidelines Controversy &#8211; The Law &#124; Living Frugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=286#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] Equal Parenting Alliance &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CAFCASS encourage shared parenting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Equal Parenting Alliance &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; CAFCASS encourage shared parenting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Gender Pay Gap by ray</title>
		<link>http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/2010/03/the-gender-pay-gap.html/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.equalparentingalliance.org/?p=351#comment-53</guid>
		<description>The Gender Gap report which Becky cites reveals in its Foreward where it is coming from &quot;Empowering women and providing them with equal rights and opportunities for fulfilling their potential is long overdue.&quot; (See P7 Foreward http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/report2009.pdf ) 

This report&#039;s starting position is that women are disadvantaged, and so it is hardly surprising that it selects data which supports this argument. 

It does not address the possibility that under-representation of women in senior management may result from choices women make because they have different priorities to men, and neither does it account for women spending 70% of money, compared to men&#039;s 30%. Greg&#039;s point is a very valid one. Who spends money is a better indicator of power than who earns it, and on this measure it is men rather than women who are treated less equally.

Ray</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gender Gap report which Becky cites reveals in its Foreward where it is coming from &#8220;Empowering women and providing them with equal rights and opportunities for fulfilling their potential is long overdue.&#8221; (See P7 Foreward <a href="http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/report2009.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.weforum.org/pdf/gendergap/report2009.pdf</a> ) </p>
<p>This report&#8217;s starting position is that women are disadvantaged, and so it is hardly surprising that it selects data which supports this argument. </p>
<p>It does not address the possibility that under-representation of women in senior management may result from choices women make because they have different priorities to men, and neither does it account for women spending 70% of money, compared to men&#8217;s 30%. Greg&#8217;s point is a very valid one. Who spends money is a better indicator of power than who earns it, and on this measure it is men rather than women who are treated less equally.</p>
<p>Ray</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
